Friday, October 5, 2012

I'm not really sure how I feel about changing teachers. I've experienced "looping" and non-looping classes and teachers before and I feel they both have their merits. In my elementary school, you kept the same teacher for 3rd and 4th grade, but you changed teachers from 1st to 2nd to 3rd. I loved my teacher in those last two years. Her classes were always fun and she taught us everything from reading to history to science in a way that was engaging and exciting. I'm so glad I had her as a teacher for two years. The second year was great because I already knew what kind of behavior and learning she expected and what kind of teaching style (not that I knew what to call it in 4th grade) to expect. We also kept mostly the same classmates, so it was great that I already knew the kids in my class. 

In my high school students had the option to "loop" teachers for freshman and sophomore year, or not. If you took the Honors track, you had different teachers both years, which is what I did. What was nice about the looping is that, again, you keep the same 3 teachers and the same 60 or so classmates for two years and 3 classes each year: Science, History and English. The teachers were able to really work together to cross the normal boundaries of learning and incorporate what students are studying in one subject into the other two. In addition, for students who sometimes struggle, there are 3 teachers that know you very well and are looking out for you. In this style of looping, there is a lot more communication between the teachers so that it is harder for a student to "fall through the cracks". Though I was never personally in the high school looping pod, I did have friends who were a part of it, and they loved it. There is a much closer bond between students and teachers and students and peers with that sort of system, as well as more freedom on the part of teachers to break out of the box and do projects that combine multiple subject areas.

On the other hand, I really enjoyed switching from one teacher to another in the Honors courses. I learned how to adapt my writing styles to multiple different teachers' requirements. I learned how to adapt my participation to what certain teachers wanted. And I learned a lot of different things from these teachers because they each brought their own experiences and interests to the class. My junior year English teacher encouraged laughter in the classroom and we were even allowed to poke fun at his mistakes sometimes. But my sophomore English teacher encouraged very sober discussions about ethical dilemmas and challenges we face in this modern day world. Both classes are some of my classes to this day, but because they were different teachers, there were different learning and teaching styles. 

I feel that changing teachers can be a good thing for the growth of some students. On the other hand, I know that some students may flourish in a class where they keep the same teacher for multiple years or classes. It is really nice to already have that rapport with the teacher, even if you're taking a completely different class with them. Even after all of this writing, I'm still not very sure how I feel about this topic. I guess what I like best is how my high school had the option to do either looping or changing teachers. I'm really proud of my high school.

4 comments:

  1. I do like how your high school had the option to decide to loop or not. Did this decision have to be made before freshman year, or could you decide at the end of the year if you wanted to continue on with the same teachers? I feel like it might be beneficial for students to decide after the year, or partially through the year if they would like to loop with the same teachers. Obviously there are benefits to staying with a teach you like, but if there is a teacher you completely clash with - it would be unfortunate to have to struggle through another year with them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like the possibility to stick with the same teachers for 2 years straight. I had the same teacher for SPAN 653 and 654 in back-to-back semesters last year. This was good because she was able to know what was coming second semester and what she had to teach first semester to get us ready for that. Any areas where we struggled, she would have to be the one who reexplained it when that topic came around again.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love the idea of "looping." The aspect of looping that I liked the most was the fact that the subject teachers overlapped their material and their was a lot of cooperation between the different teachers. A great things about this is that subject teachers can collaborate in this way even if there are non-looping classes. It would be incredible to have the history teacher at the high school I work at to be doing a unit on the Mexican revolution while my students in Spanish III are reading short stories from that time period or watching a movie based on that era. And if I do have looping classes I know that I will get to know my students even better. I like how you said that both looping and non-looping classes have their benefits. Melissa brings up a good point, maybe allowing students to decide whether or not they want to loop with the same teacher would allow students to choose what will work better for them. I would have definitely chosen to switch Spanish teachers in high school if I had had the option. The "looping" I experienced was not a purposeful one, it was only because of the limited number of Spanish teachers at my high school.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm still not sure how I feel about the subject entirely, either. My favorite classes, both in high school and in college, have always been the classes that involved having the same teacher and classmates for multiple semesters. It really does create a bond, and it takes away a lot of anxiety at the beginning of each school year because you're already familiar with the people. On the other hand, there have been classmates or teachers that I didn't get along with and was stuck with them for multiple semesters, which had the opposite effect. For this reason, I think it's really all just a matter of chance; there's no sure way to know if one is statistically better than the other.

    ReplyDelete